Bottom Line: ACME Corporation's external security posture has several areas requiring attention. We identified 8 vulnerabilities across your public-facing infrastructure, including 1 critical and 2 high-severity issues that should be addressed within the next 7 days.
The most significant risks involve a remote code execution vulnerability on your customer portal, employee credentials found in public data breaches, and an exposed administrative panel. These are exactly the types of weaknesses attackers look for when targeting organizations.
Good news: Your main website is properly configured with modern security headers, your DNS records show no signs of hijacking vulnerabilities, and your web application firewall is correctly blocking common attack patterns.
This assessment covered the external attack surface of ACME Corporation, including:
Our assessment followed industry-standard methodologies including OWASP, PTES, and NIST guidelines. Testing was conducted from an external perspective, simulating what an attacker could discover and exploit without internal access.
| Assessment Area | Description |
|---|---|
| Attack Surface Mapping | Discovery of all public-facing assets, DNS records, subdomains, and exposed services |
| Vulnerability Testing | Identification of known vulnerabilities in exposed services and applications |
| Email Security | Analysis of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC configurations |
| SSL/TLS Analysis | Certificate validation and cryptographic configuration review |
| Credential Exposure | Search for breached credentials associated with the organization |
| DNS Security | Zone configuration and DNS hijacking risk assessment |
| ID | Finding | Severity | CVSS | NIST CSF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIO-001 | Remote Code Execution on Public Web Application | Critical | 9.8 | PR.IP-1 |
| ZIO-002 | Outdated TLS Configuration on Customer Portal | Medium | 5.9 | PR.DS-2 |
| ZIO-003 | Breached Employee Credentials Discovered | High | 7.4 | PR.AC-1 |
| ZIO-004 | Exposed Administrative Panel | High | 7.5 | PR.AC-3 |
| ZIO-005 | Missing Security Headers on Portal | Medium | 4.7 | PR.IP-1 |
| ZIO-006 | SSL Certificate Expires in 21 Days | Low | 3.1 | PR.DS-2 |
| ZIO-007 | Directory Listing Enabled on Dev Server | Low | 3.7 | ID.AM-1 |
| ZIO-008 | Missing DMARC Policy on Email Domain | Medium | 4.3 | DE.CM-1 |
| Severity | CVSS Range | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | 9.0 - 10.0 | Immediate exploitation likely; significant business impact. Remediate within 24-48 hours. |
| High | 7.0 - 8.9 | Exploitation probable; major impact. Remediate within 7 days. |
| Medium | 4.0 - 6.9 | Exploitation possible; moderate impact. Remediate within 30 days. |
| Low | 0.1 - 3.9 | Exploitation unlikely; minor impact. Remediate within 90 days. |
| Info | 0.0 | Informational finding; best practice recommendation. |
We discovered a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the web application running on your customer portal. The application is running an outdated version of Apache Struts (2.3.x) that is vulnerable to CVE-2017-5638, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the server.
An attacker exploiting this vulnerability could:
We confirmed remote code execution by injecting a command through the Content-Type header:
Note: Payload truncated for brevity. No data was accessed or modified during testing.
The customer portal accepts connections using TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1, which are outdated protocols with known security vulnerabilities. These protocols are deprecated and no longer considered secure for protecting sensitive data in transit.
Attackers on the same network as a customer (such as public WiFi) could potentially intercept and decrypt sensitive business data transmitted to/from the portal. This is a regulatory compliance concern for protecting sensitive data in transit.
We found 3 employee email addresses from your organization in public data breach databases. These credentials were exposed in third-party breaches (not a breach of your systems) but pose a risk if employees reuse passwords across services.
If any of these employees use the same password for their work accounts, attackers could gain unauthorized access to your systems. This is especially concerning for organizations where such access could lead to sensitive data exposure.
| Breach Source | Date | |
|---|---|---|
| j.smith@acme-corp.com | LinkedIn 2021 | 2021-06-22 |
| m.johnson@acme-corp.com | Adobe 2019 | 2019-10-15 |
| r.davis@acme-corp.com | Dropbox 2016 | 2016-08-31 |
Note: Actual passwords not displayed for security.
The WordPress administrative panel is publicly accessible at a predictable URL (/wp-admin) with no IP restrictions or additional access controls. The login page is exposed to the internet, allowing any attacker to attempt authentication. Combined with the breached credentials identified in ZIO-003, this significantly increases the risk of unauthorized administrative access.
An attacker who gains administrative access to the WordPress panel could:
The customer portal is missing several recommended HTTP security headers that help protect users from various web-based attacks.
| Header | Status | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Content-Security-Policy | Missing | Prevents XSS attacks |
| X-Frame-Options | Missing | Prevents clickjacking |
| X-Content-Type-Options | Present | Prevents MIME sniffing |
| Strict-Transport-Security | Missing | Forces HTTPS |
Add the following headers to your web server configuration:
The SSL certificate for your VPN portal expires on February 25, 2026. If not renewed, users will see security warnings and may be unable to connect.
Renew the SSL certificate before expiration. Consider setting up auto-renewal with Let's Encrypt or configuring calendar reminders 30 days before future expirations.
A development server was discovered that allows directory listing. While no sensitive files were exposed, this server should not be publicly accessible.
Restrict access to development servers using IP allowlisting or VPN requirements. Disable directory listing in the web server configuration.
The acme-corp.com domain does not have a DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) policy configured. Without DMARC, attackers can send emails that appear to come from your domain, making phishing attacks against your customers and employees more convincing.
Without a DMARC policy, attackers can spoof emails from your domain to:
The following roadmap prioritizes remediation efforts based on risk severity and implementation complexity. We recommend addressing issues in the order presented.
| Priority | Finding | Effort | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate 24-48 hours |
ZIO-001: Remote Code Execution | Low | Week 1 |
| Immediate 24-48 hours |
ZIO-003: Breached Credentials (force reset) | Low | Week 1 |
| Short-term 1-7 days |
ZIO-004: Exposed Admin Panel | Medium | Week 1-2 |
| Medium-term 1-4 weeks |
ZIO-002: Outdated TLS Configuration | Low | Week 2-3 |
| Medium-term 1-4 weeks |
ZIO-005: Missing Security Headers | Medium | Week 2-4 |
| Medium-term 1-4 weeks |
ZIO-008: Missing DMARC Policy | Low | Week 2-4 |
| Short-term 1-7 days |
ZIO-006: SSL Certificate Renewal | Low | Before Feb 25 |
| Long-term 1-3 months |
ZIO-007: Dev Server Access | Low | Month 2 |
This External Penetration Test identified 8 vulnerabilities in ACME Corporation's external attack surface. The most critical issues, the remote code execution vulnerability and breached credentials, should be addressed immediately and will significantly improve your security posture.
If you have questions about any findings or need help prioritizing remediation, contact us at support@ziosecurity.com.
Thank you for choosing Zio Security.
The following tools were used during this assessment:
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Nmap | Port scanning and service enumeration |
| Nuclei | Vulnerability scanning |
| SSLyze | SSL/TLS configuration analysis |
| Subfinder / Amass | Subdomain enumeration |
| Dehashed | Credential breach search |
| MXToolbox | Email security analysis |
| SecurityHeaders.com | HTTP header analysis |
Findings in this report are mapped to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) to support compliance and risk management efforts.
| NIST CSF Control | Description | Related Findings |
|---|---|---|
| ID.AM-1 | Physical devices and systems are inventoried | ZIO-007 |
| PR.AC-1 | Identities and credentials are issued, managed, verified, revoked, and audited | ZIO-003 |
| PR.AC-3 | Remote access is managed | ZIO-004 |
| PR.DS-2 | Data-in-transit is protected | ZIO-002, ZIO-006 |
| DE.CM-1 | The network is monitored to detect potential cybersecurity events | ZIO-008 |
| PR.IP-1 | A baseline configuration of systems is created and maintained | ZIO-001, ZIO-005 |